-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
Run load flow with main synchronous component mode #1292
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Clement Philipot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Clement Philipot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: PRABAKARAN Sylvestre <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: PRABAKARAN Sylvestre <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: PRABAKARAN Sylvestre <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Olivier Perrin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Didier Vidal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Didier Vidal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Didier Vidal <[email protected]>
bf25059 to
a00e87b
Compare
…1286) Signed-off-by: Clement Philipot <[email protected]>
Base automatically changed from
new_openloadflow_mainsynchronous
to
ci/core-7.1.0-SNAPSHOT
November 26, 2025 14:11
Signed-off-by: Didier Vidal <[email protected]>
src/main/java/com/powsybl/openloadflow/sensi/DcSensitivityAnalysis.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/java/com/powsybl/openloadflow/sa/OpenSecurityAnalysisTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
vidaldid-rte
requested changes
Nov 27, 2025
Collaborator
vidaldid-rte
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Few minor changes (on DC sensi, and on tests).
Will need the RC available, and Sonar and coverage result for final approval.
Signed-off-by: PRABAKARAN Sylvestre <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: PRABAKARAN Sylvestre <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: PRABAKARAN Sylvestre <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: PRABAKARAN Sylvestre <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: PRABAKARAN Sylvestre <[email protected]>
|
vidaldid-rte
approved these changes
Dec 1, 2025
jeandemanged
approved these changes
Dec 2, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.



This PR cannot be merged before #1286 (Change of parameter name in core connectedComponentMode -> componentMode)
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?
#1279 (powsybl-open-loadflow)
powsybl/powsybl-core#3577 (powsybl-core)
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
This PR support the new introduced mode componentMode=MAIN_SYNCHRONOUS
What is the current behavior?
Only MAIN_CONNECTED and ALL_CONNECTED are supported. But for a main connected component that has multiple synchronous components, it is not possible to compute only the main synchronous component.
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
MAIN_CONNECTED, ALL_CONNECTED and MAIN_SYNCHRONOUS are supported
Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?